Colonoscopy vs sigmoidoscopy: new studies fuel ongoing debate.

نویسنده

  • Charlie Schmidt
چکیده

Mounting evidence shows that colorectal screening reduces cancer incidence and mortality, but scientists still disagree about the best way to look for risky polyps. Clinicians in the US favor colonoscopy, while European health systems rely far more on flexible sigmoidoscopy–a cheaper, less invasive method that can be performed without sedation, but that also reaches only into the distal or “left” side of the colon, while leaving the proximal or “right” side nearer to the large intestine un-monitored. According to Martin Brown, M.D., chief of the health services and economics branch at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), colonoscopy rates among those eligible for the procedure in the US (generally individuals aged 50 and over) climbed dramatically after Medicare began covering the procedure–from 19% in 2000 to 54.6% in 2010. Rates of flexible sigmoidoscopy (in combination with fecal occult blood testing, or FOBT) declined from 9.4% to 1.3% over the same time period.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparing Current Screening Modalities for Colorectal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions: Is Colonoscopy the Method of Choice?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common form of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the Western world. Presently, screening tools such as colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and computed tomographic colonography (CTC) are available for CRC screening. The debate over which screening tool is most effective in detecting CRC and precancerous lesion...

متن کامل

Systematic review: the use of nitrous oxide gas for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND Nitrous oxide gas (N(2)O) has been proposed as an alternative to intravenous (i.v.) analgesia in patients undergoing lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. AIM To perform a systematic review of randomized studies where N(2)O was compared against control in patients undergoing either flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. METHODS Electronic databases were searched; reference lists were...

متن کامل

Prospective comparison of double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding: barium enema v colonoscopy in rectal bleeding.

Rectal bleeding often heralds serious colonic disease. The literature suggests that colonoscopy is superior to barium enema plus sigmoidoscopy, although no good comparative studies exist. Seventy one patients with overt rectal bleeding had prospectively flexible sigmoidoscopy, double contrast barium enema and colonoscopy completed independently. Against the gold standard, the sensitivity and sp...

متن کامل

Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

OBJECTIVES To review, summarise, and compare the evidence for effectiveness of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy in the prevention of colorectal cancer occurrence and deaths. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Two investigators independently extracted character...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the National Cancer Institute

دوره 104 18  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012